Recruitment and Retention in Global Clinical Research
Recruitment and retention of participants are central to the success of global clinical trials. Major multinational studies frequently experience delays or fail due to under-enrollment and poor retention, highlighting the necessity for sophisticated, globalized recruitment services.
Recruitment is Critical to The Success of Global Clinical Trials:
Direct Impact on Timelines and ROI: 86% of international clinical trials fail to meet recruitment targets within planned timelines, causing delays in drug development and increased operational costs.
Data Power and Validity: Underpowered studies due to inadequate enrollment or high dropout rates weaken results and may limit regulatory approval.
Global Diversity and Real-World Relevance: Trials lacking geographic and demographic diversity produce less generalizable findings, which can impede both regulatory success and health equity.
Why Global Recruitment Partners Are Essential
Are you ready to accelerate your clinical research? Partnering with Deqa Wa Seha’s global recruitment services is the key to faster, more diverse, and highly impactful trials. By leveraging extensive networks, advanced digital tools, and in-depth local insights, we enable expedited enrollment, seamless regulatory navigation, and improved participant retention across the globe.
Collaborating with specialized global recruitment partners helps reduce costly delays, broaden patient diversity, and bring therapies to market more quickly. Now is the time to invest in strategic, scalable, and innovative solutions that drive clinical trial success.
Let’s unlock the future of clinical research together—connect with Deqa Wa Seha’s experts today and transform your trial outcomes. (Man Hung et al., 2024).
Reference:
Man Hung, A. Mohajeri, K. Almpani, G. Carberry, J. F. Wisniewski, K. Janes, … & F. W. Licari. (2024). Successes and challenges in clinical trial recruitment: The experience of a new study team.
Medical Sciences (Basel), 12(3), 39.
#ClinicalResearchAdvancement #InnovateClinicalResearch #PatientRecruitment #ClinicalTrialInnovation #TrialRetention #ResearchOpportunities
Deqa Wa Seha contributes to the global evidence base through peer-reviewed publications, congress research, and white papers. Explore our published work in oncology, real-world evidence, and health economics — alongside practical perspectives on running trials across global markets.
Our leadership has authored and led research presented at major international congresses and published in respected peer-reviewed journals — spanning hepatocellular carcinoma registries, accelerated approval pathways, and cross-market burden-of-disease studies. This section brings that body of work together with our own white papers, so sponsors and partners can see the depth of evidence and thinking behind how we operate.
A curated list of authored publications. Items 1–11 are authored by Dr. Yvanka Gilliam; items 12–13 are AHCC08 Asia-Pacific registry publications whose operational architecture she led. Each entry links to the abstract, poster, or article on the publisher’s primary source.
Chow PKH, …, Gilliam YM, et al.
Chow PKH, …, Gilliam Y, et al.
Chow PKH, …, Gilliam Y, et al.
Yen C, …, Gilliam Y, et al.
Johnson I, Chou B, Grillo V, Sevilla M, Singh SS, Gilliam Y.
Ken-Opurum J, Fukuda T, Chen Y, Gilliam Y, Stankus A.
Chen Y, Gilliam Y, Singh SS, Jung S, Fang H.
Gilliam Y (lead author), Teoh C, Singh SS, Chen Y, Grillo V.
Gilliam Y (lead author), Singh SS, Chen Y, Kim J, Fang H.
Chen Y, Singh SS, Fang H, Jung S, Gilliam Y, Grillo V.
Delgerekh N, …, Gilliam Y, et al.
The two publications below emerged from the AHCC08 Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma registry, whose operational architecture Dr. Gilliam led across her tenure at IQVIA Asia-Pacific and Kantar Health. She is not in the byline, but the operational leadership is verified.
Chow PKH, et al.
Sim YK, et al.
Each paper is available as a downloadable PDF. We publish a card here only once the final PDF and title are confirmed — so what you see is what you can rely on.
Across the Gulf Cooperation Council, a decade of health-data investment is converging into a regulatory reality: locally generated, registry-grade real-world evidence is now required to support marketing authorization, health technology assessment, and formulary access. This paper introduces the GCC Registry Readiness Model — five operational pillars, fifteen success criteria, and five measurable KPIs — derived from a peer-reviewed multi-country RWE program across Asia-Pacific (2017–2023) and translated for the Gulf's regulatory, data-infrastructure, and jurisdictional environment. Malaffi, Nabidh, Riayati, and the Saudi Cancer Registry hold submission-grade data today; the constraint is registry-governance discipline.
Published August 2026 · Zenodo · CC BY 4.0 · DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22086631
A two-page cover-level orientation to the full paper. Sets out the regulatory reality driving GCC-native real-world evidence submissions, the operational constraint the paper addresses, the five pillars of the GCC Registry Readiness Model, and the paper's core argument: the constraint on GCC RWE submissions is not data availability — it is registry-governance discipline. Written for regulators, sponsors, CROs, and investigator teams who need the argument before the architecture.
Published August 2026 · Zenodo · CC BY 4.0 · Part of DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22086631
A two-page executive brief for regulators, sponsors, CROs, and investigator networks working on GCC real-world evidence readiness. Distills the full paper's core argument into a briefing format suitable for board pre-reads, sponsor conversations, and regulator engagements. Covers the regulatory shift, the GCC Registry Readiness Model in five bullets, what the full paper contains, and what comes next in Papers 2 and 3 (health economics; precision diagnostics).
Published August 2026 · Zenodo · CC BY 4.0 · Part of DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22086631
Whether you are evaluating a partner or building a study, our published research and white papers show how we think and how we deliver. Reach out to discuss your program.
The thinking you see here is the same thinking we apply to live studies. Our insights aren’t abstract commentary — they come from running trials at the site level, every day.
If a topic here maps to a problem in your program, bring it to us and we will show you how we would put it into practice.